Wednesday, 27 January 2021

Reagan: Could the Supreme Court Enshrine Anti-Life Mandated Speech?

 Could the Supreme Court end up permanently overriding the First Amendment of the Constitution in favor of the abortion industry? That’s what Newmax TV analyst Michael Reagan suggests is a likely outcome of the fight in California over the state’s Reproductive FACT Act.

Upheld by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in mid-October, the law threatens to fine 75 pro-life state-licensed medical clinics who offer free ultrasound and other no-cost medical services if they refuse to post or distribute a government-specified message the organizations say violates their constitutionally enshrined rights to free speech and religious convictions.

Reagan, the eldest son of former president Ronald Reagan, wrote Sunday that the law, “requires Christian pro-life pregnancy counseling offices to violate fundamental, bedrock Christian belief and make referrals to an abortion killing center.”

“In effect this means if a conflicted and troubled pregnant woman comes to the center for Christian counseling, in addition to advice on raising the child herself or putting it up for adoption center employees are ordered by the state to also suggest the woman visit an abortionist,” Reagan argued.

Tweet This: California #abortion promo law violates "bedrock Christian belief". @ReaganWorld #prolife

The notice, which the law specifies must either be posted as a public notice in “22-point type,” “distributed to all clients in no less than 14-point font” or distributed digitally “at the time of check-in or arrival,” applies to all pregnancy help medical clinics licensed by the state.  

"California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion for eligible women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social services office at [insert the telephone number]."

Meanwhile, pregnancy help centers that do not offer medical services will be required to post the following signage in two “clear and conspicuous” places—“in the entrance of the facility and at least one additional area where clients wait to receive services,” as well as in “any print and digital advertising materials including Internet Web sites”.

The font required is to be “in no less than 48-point type” and will read as follows:

"This facility is not licensed as a medical facility by the State of California and has no licensed medical provider who provides or directly supervises the provision of services."

While Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) and the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed petitions for a rehearing from the court late last week—in addition to a motion for a preliminary injunction in Illinois, where a newly adopted law requires pro-life medicos of all stripes to refer for abortions—Reagan cautioned against an overly optimistic view of a fight that may take pregnancy help organizations all the way to the Supreme Court.

“As tempting as it is for the plaintiffs to appeal that literally ungodly ruling to the Supreme Court, that is a dangerous course,” Reagan said. “Currently there are only two possible outcomes with this Supreme Court. The current composition of the court—four liberal hacks vs. two conservatives and two weather vanes—means that a tie, which doesn’t establish a precedent, still allows the California ruling to remain in effect, is the best possible outcome, but that is no victory at all.”

[Click here to subscribe to Pregnancy Help News!]

Reagan, whose father appointed Justice Anthony Kennedy—the swing vote in the 2015 Obergerfell v. Hodges case legalizing same-sex marriage and the 2016 Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case striking down commonsense abortion regulations in Texas—pointed out in his column that it would be a violation of free speech even if the shoe were on the other foot and it was Planned Parenthood who was forced to promote life-affirming pregnancy centers.

recent summary judgment throwing out a 2009 Baltimore city ordinance that bears similarities to the California requirement on non-medical centers fell into line with previous attempts to force pregnancy centers to post signage specifying which services they do not offer in Austin (TX), Montgomery County (MD), Washington state, Oregon and New York City, but the law in California has been unsuccessfully challenged five times in the courts since last December.

Even with past precedent on the side of pregnancy centers, the abortion industry’s sway over governmental agencies, including the present composition of the Supreme Court, leads Reagan to project the continued trampling of pro-life free speech and exercise of religion.

“The worst, and most likely [outcome], is that one of the weather vanes will join the four leftists and establish a nationwide precedent that makes Christian freedom of speech contingent on the wishes of Planned Parenthood and abortion cheerleaders in state legislatures.”

Jay Hobbs

Part-time thinker, full-time husband, daddy, pastor, and baseball fan, Jay Hobbs served as editor of from its 2015 inception through the spring of 2018. Jay served on staff at Heartbeat International from 2012 to 2018, the last four of those years as Director of Communications and Marketing. Jay's writing has appeared at Newsweek, The Washington Times, The Washington ExaminerThe Federalist, The Daily Signal, The Christian Post, CNS News and The Gospel Coalition, as well as several national pro-life news outlets.

Leave a comment



Get Pregnancy Help News delivered to your inbox each Monday morning.